Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 07:58

What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Enim eius molestiae qui iste impedit qui voluptatem iste.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Forget Commander, Clive is the core of my new MTG Final Fantasy standard deck - wargamer.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
How will ADHD stimulants affect a teenager?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is a good source for finding job candidates?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Answering the Nintendo Switch 2’s lingering accessibility questions - The Verge